Thursday, March 17, 2016

Take it from a Korean

Hello my loves. Today I'm going to be posting something that I guess borders on controversial. Also disclaimer, this post will most likely have curse words because that's the only way to describe how much I'm so angry about this book.

Man, Alexa, what do you mean? 

Well I mean I'm going to be talking about a book that I utterly despise but everybody seems to love. Mostly it's because there's a lot of topics in this book that the community talks about in terms of diversity that people seem to just gloss over in this particular book because it's a great story I guess (to me personally? It's a pretty bad story). 

I'm going to be talking about Eleanor and Park. This is a YA book that's been a hit ever since it hit the shelves and from what it looks like, it made Rainbow Rowell's career. I might be in the wrong here, but the reaction I have from this book is so real and so infuriating that I need to talk about it. 


I dislike Eleanor and Park because of the way Park was written. Objectively, his character is boring and just an edgy try-hard in my opinion. He listens to the Smiths, wears black, wears eyeliner, the works. He's like trying to be a goth kid and it's just not working. So if this was a white guy, I'd still probably dislike the book. But as a Korean American? This book just bordered on ridiculous. Let me get the first thing through here first. 

Park's name is Park Sheridan. I'm sorry let me repeat this.

PARK'S NAME IS PARK SHERIDAN.  
Do you know what the problem this poses? Park is a Korean last name. For a Korean kid to have a last name as a first name, first of all is just right out ridiculous. I will be honest, I DNF'd this novel. I couldn't get like past five chapters of this book because the story was the most 500 Days of Summer, special snowflake, all on the surface kind of love story I've ever seen. But the fact that Park's name is just Park.  I, for the longest time, thought that Eleanor didn't call him by his first name because Park was supposed to be Korean-American right? So we ALL HAVE TO KNOW ALL THE DAMN TIME that he's Korean so she only calls him by Park. 

But no. 

Turns out that's his first name. This is actually hysterical. I thought my Korean name is bad. Holy moly. If he ever sees his family in Korea or something he'll be the butt of so many jokes. I'm so sorry Park. Literally what the fuck. 

Now the greater issue? Eleanor compares Park and his mom in the most stereotypical way. She says that his eyes are almond shaped, that his skin is yellow, that  (apparently) he has some ninja magic, this and that about literally the most stereotypical East Asian stereotype there is but Korean. Like man as if there weren't Koreans in the 80s? Not even that, whenever Eleanor says some shit like that Park doesn't seem to want to correct her? Rainbow Rowell talks about how she wants diversity in YA or literature and all of this stuff, but like what would've made all of this reasonable is that Eleanor learns that you know Park isn't just some half Asian-half white kid who happens to live in her block. I guess they end up in love with each other but all Eleanor has to say near the end is:

"Stupid Asian kid.
Stupid, beautiful Asian kid."

I mean I guess it's supposed to come full circle, but like what. That's all you learned in this entire book? You learned that the Asian kid you hated in the beginning is actually a beautiful Asian kid? Are you serious? Rainbow Rowell makes it seem like this book is supposed to promote diversity or interracial relationships but like... no?? This is not how you promote a healthy interracial relationship? It honestly would've been better if Park's heritage was mention a smaller amount of times because this is supposed to be about Eleanor and Park falling in love with each other and growing? Not Eleanor falling in love with this psuedo punk rock Korean guy. 

Oh and his mom? His mom is described like a China doll. Just:

"Eleanor imagined Park's dad, Tom Selleck, tucking his Dainty China person into his flack jacket and sneaking her out of Korea." 

What is his mom a drug that needed to be smuggled into America?

Like I just... If you're going to try and promote diversity in YA fiction or fiction in general this is not how you do it. You know how you do it? You have these minorities in your stories act like real living beings. You don't make them seem like a China doll. You know what would have been nice? If that was what Eleanor thought and then she met Park's mom and discovered, oh wow. This isn't just some stereotype I've been grown up to believe. This is an actual person with feelings. She doesn't even seem that curious about the Korean culture. 

What's even funnier? Is just how wrong Rowell seems to write Korean women. She writes Park's mom to be this dainty flower that doesn't really speak up much and is just the face of demure Asian wives everywhere, which--newsflash--ISN'T THE CASE. I'm going to tell you right now, because I'm a Korean woman we are not like this. Most Korean women are spit fires. You know what Park's mom probably would've said to Park? She probably would've made a comment about Eleanor's weight. It's not a hugely positive thing, but it's something that's really engrained in the culture. 

Now I've been ranting and raving about this book and you've probably clicked away from this post. If not, comment at the end because I will like send you chocolates or something. My biggest issue with this book? It's overwhelming popularity. I normally don't have an issue with contemporary novels getting a great number of good reviews. What I have a problem with, is that no one seems to bring up these issues in the novel. I feel like they probably let it slide because "Oh yeah it was the 80s in Omaha. It's probably going to be racist". You know what? Yeah. I'll give them that. Sure. But what would've made this not as cringe worthy and not as skin crawly is if Eleanor changed in that view somewhat. That's what would've made this novel an actual diverse novel. Having a diverse novel doesn't mean that the main love interest is half Korean and you get to say all this racist shit in the book about East Asians. That's not how it works. All it did was further perpetuate that it's totally okay to love a guy because he's Korean and maybe a psuedo punk/goth kid.

There was absolutely nothing about Korean culture in this book. His mom was nothing like a Korean mother. He seemed to have absolutely zero connection to his heritage (which, alright, I feel this on a personal level). There wasn't a mention at all about Korean foods, Korean customs--nothing showing that Eleanor really cared about his Korean heritage. Only the fact that he was this exotic Asian person that sees her for who she truly is:

Not like the other girls. 

Honestly, this book wouldn't have struck such an angry chord with me if Park's Asianess wasn't mentioned in like every other chapter. I would've passed it off as another contemporary I don't like because it deals with this whole "I'm not like the other girls" manic pixie dream girl story line that I really just side eye because yawn. But the fact that Park's Asianess is so emphasized in this book shows me just how little Rowell really wanted to fully portray this diverse cast. She didn't want to show people "hey guys these stereotypes are wrong". She just wanted to show that she can have two Asian people in a book and pander to an audience that wants more "diversity". It honestly just shows her lack of research in the topic. Authors really like to boast and brag about how much research they do, but the research here is simply... Not here. It really bothers me because if I was going to write a novel about a culture I don't fully understand (and Rowell has admitted that she lived in a white and racist town. Like wouldn't that tell you hmm I may not have the best image of these people????) I would go out and ask people that... you know are part of the culture. I wouldn't just go blindly and say, "Yeah that's totally how that's gonna work". 

Honestly? I would've given her more credit if she attempted to put in some kind of culture other than their skin color and their facial features. I would've not been as angry if she had made an attempt to show what Park's home life was other than an Asian mom who can't really speak English and is really skinny (newsflash, not all Asian people are skinny. A lot of them are, but not all of them). But like what? Did she just decide to uproot the culture that she was raised in? Did she just decide on a whim yeah I'm not going to have bibimbap or kimchi or kalgooksu ever again? 

Like damn son I don't even like Korean food that much, but if someone told me you're never going to have bibimbap again I'd just say BYE FELICIA.

*let's out a breath*

If you've made it to the end. Please tell me through Twitter or something, like it means a lot that you've decided to stick it out to the end. 

I would like to hear your thoughts. 

Agree or Disagree? I may have been too harsh, but this is just how I feel about it. 

Comments (24)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I haven't read this book. I didn't know Park was actually half-Korean! Using Park as a first name is indeed ridiculous, like it doesn't make sense on any level. I agree with you that if the only thing that constitutes diversity in this book is the fact that the MC is half-Korean but does not actually celebrate that heritage then it's just another contemporary novel and should not be marketed as such. It's a shame though, when it could have been utilized better :( I hope more authors take the time to understand the cultures they want to include in their book, just out of respect for it.
My recent post Announcement: 2 weeks short-hiatus!
1 reply · active 480 weeks ago
Yeah. I'm mostly angry at how popular and beloved it is but people don't want to point out these gross steretypical things that are throughout the ENTIRE book. Like come on guys. We're always talking it up about diversity, but you're not going to critique someone who did it terribly wrong?

For the longest time I was like "DOES PARK EVEN HAVE A FIRST NAME? IS HIS NAME PARK PARK??" And then I found out that his first name is actually Park and I just couldn't. Like WHO NAMES THEIR CHILD AFTER A LAST NAME???
I'm not Korean, but I AGREE. I couldn't quite pinpoint why I didn't love Eleanor and Park until you wrote this - SO THANK YOU. I guess I feel like Park was just Korean, just for the sake of it - and for me, that's so much worse than misrepresentation sometimes. I found that passage about almond eyes problematic as well!! :/
THANK YOU FOR THIS POST, Alexa. It's written well - you didn't offend me! :)
My recent post This or That Book Tag!
1 reply · active 480 weeks ago
He was like the token Asian boyfriend. It's almost as bad as those kpop fan girls who want a Korean boyfriend because they think all Korean guys are like the members of a kpop boy band (which is SO wrong it's hilarious). From a writing standpoint, I really couldn't handle the novel. Like at all. It made my eye roll almost all the time. But then she just kept going on about how he was ASIAN how he was THE ASIAN KID like. Dude. I get it.

Thanks for reading and thanks for your support! ;-;
Ugh, casual racism is honestly the worst, because it kind of fools you into thinking it's accepting and diverse, when really it's the opposite?? I first read Eleanor and Park quite a few years ago when I was but a naive twelvie, and I think if I read it again now I'd be pretty mad. Us white people need to just...stop.

And this is why in the novel I'M writing, which has a Korean-Australian MC, I'm going to ask some Korean readers to beta-read it and hopefully tell me if I'm being (accidentally) offensive. Because ignorant racism is just the worst.
My recent post Are Negative Reviews More Convincing Than Positive Reviews?
1 reply · active 480 weeks ago
Honestly? It was more offensive that she kept saying and mentioning literally anything else BUT Korean stereotypes lol. I would be slightly annoyed and probably just as angry at its popularity if it was riddled with Korean stereotypes, but the fact that Eleanor never actually says a single Korean stereotype just makes me so mad. Like yes, us Asians are all one and the same.

When I write novels I write in a lot of Korean characters because for one thing Koreans are hardly in anything. When anyone thinks of East Asians they think of China Japan and then maybe North Korea. And if they think of South Korea, all they know is like K-pop (which is fine but ok). So I like to have my culture mentioned lol. It's also important to know what culture you're writing from because most likely they're going to be raised different with different values (like how I said Park's mom would've mentioned Eleanor's weight to Park... even to Eleanor but maybe not).
Ahhh, I totally get this. *nods* Like I didn't see that when I read Eleanor and Park? Because I read it a while ago and wasn't that in tune with diversity in books PLUS I am not Korean so these things wouldn't jump out at me so much. and THAT'S like the biggest problem when authors write without research! Because it makes tons and tons of people think "oh that's how Koreans are" when in fact, like you said, they're NOT and we're all getting told the wrong things here. It's really unfair.
Like when I read an Australian character written by a not-Australian writer, it's almost always offensively done and annoying and gah. It honestly ruined a book for me recently. A writer cannot rely on stereotypes when writing cultures other than their own!
(I did like E&P when I read it, but I was NOT blown away like everyone else seemed to be???)
1 reply · active 480 weeks ago
Yeah see! That's what I'm talking about. It just offends me that she just thought it would be a fun idea to try without any research. Does she not realize that shes writing books to people who are really impressionable? Actually most Asian women I meet in general aren't like the stereotypes were made out to be. The most I can see is /maybe/ Japanese women, but Japanese people are just really nice and courteous. So most of it comes from them wanting to be polite and nice. Not dainty and weak ugh.

I won't knock anyone down for liking E&P as a story objectively. It's not my style, I get really annoyed by those kinds of character tropes so I was like na. But you like what you like and I like what I like right? Haha. It honestly just makes me not want to read any of Rowell's books.
I've got to admit that I didn't like the book that much, but for different reasons. This is A VERY VERY valid one to do it, which is why I like this post so much. I can see why all of these things would bother you and you're totally right. Either you make it a pure love story and don't mention it being diverse or anything, and you do, and actually put in the work to make that statement true.

I bet she didn't even notice how she was unintentionally ignoring this big culture behind Park, but still, it doesn't make it right. For example, the fact that Park is used as a last name for Koreans was something I didn't know, and exactly the kind of thing that should be included if we're talking about diversity, where the point is not only to say 'Hey, diverse character here', but to actually show how these people live.

All in all, thanks for bringing up this topic, because, even though the author can't go back and change this, maybe it's an opportunity for her, and for other authors to keep in mind how the way they handle 'diversity' can affect their readers.
1 reply · active 479 weeks ago
Yeah I just feel like Rowell didn't do really... any research about the culture. Like as far as I know she might not have thought that we don't ever use last names as a first name and thought having a character being called Park was cool. The fact that our culture is so not a part of the book just made me feel like she should've taken it out altogether instead of having it riddled with racist and stereotypical comments. But the fact that we're reminded almost every chapter that Park is half asian other than the fact that his first name is Park makes it seem like there should've been more effort and something that changes in regards to Eleanor's views on race. But that's not really the case.
I have not read this book but I've seen it lauded to the skies everywhere so I thought I would read it eventually. It's very illuminating to read your thoughts and disturbing to think that Korean culture is dealt with in such a superficial manner.

Regarding the use of "Park" as a first name, the use of last names as first names has been a practice in English for a very long time, and in recent years has very trendy (Madison, Taylor, etc.). But it seems it's different for Koreans, and Rowell did not take account of that.
1 reply · active 479 weeks ago
Yeah I was going to say something about that with the last names, but in Korean culture we don't ever use our last names as a first name. It's just ridiculous (or at least I guess I think it's ridiculous). I think it's more rooted into the culture that your surname is really important so the fact that someone would name their child a surname that's not theirs as a first name is just something we don't do.
Really thought-provoking post. I will admit that I loved E&P. I was a teenager in the 1980s and it really resonated for me in that way. I'm not a fan of romances in general, but this one got me.

Then I started hearing people express anger about how Park was portrayed. And at first, yes, I was all, "But it's the '80s in Omaha." It really is stunning how ignorant we were about things that are commonplace now. Like, I went to a high school of 2,000 in a medium sized city, and I didn't think I knew any gay people. HA! Ha, ha, ha.

But as I read more articles like this one, I realize that it's not okay to say, "I liked the book, so it isn't racist," or even "I liked the book for qualities outside of its treatment of race." It's not okay for me to excuse racism. I think Gone with the Wind is inexcusable, even if it's a famously sweeping story written in a different era. Just because E&P is more my cup of tea doesn't mean it should get a free pass.

I would like to know what Rowell thinks in retrospect. I'm sure she was defensive when this issue was first brought up, but I wonder if over time she's realized what the issues are.

Thank you for writing this.
1 reply · active 479 weeks ago
The thing is, we can love great pieces of literature but we have to be able to look at its beauty as well as its flaws. We tend to overlook the bad because of the overwhelmingly good. I personally have done that with things before and it's just a matter of being more conscious.

It's like I said too, though. Eleanor's narrative and inner monologue could be full of racist and stereotypical comments, but what would've made it reasonable was if there was this juxtaposition between what Eleanor thought based off of a lot of stereotypes that would've been part of the culture of 80's Omaha and the reality that was Park's mother. And then it would've been even better if Eleanor changed her views on Asians or she becomes more conscious about what she's thinking. That's the biggest issue. It's just that there's nothing other than racism and stereotypes. There wasn't actual culture other than their skin tone and their genetics.

I'm sure she was defensive because who would want their work to be so harshly criticized, but I think she needs to understand what I have a problem with. It just feels like she put this Asian flavor on a character rather than writing a character that was from the culture. It just shows in how she writes Park and Park's mom. I can't blame someone for not understanding or not having being part of a culture, but I get upset when someone doesn't even seem to have made an effort.
My recent post Let's Get to Know Victoria and Kit • Beautiful People
Wait, Park's his FIRST name?! I haven't read the book (contemporaries aren't really my thing), so basically all I know about it is it's set in the 80s and the male love interest is Korean-American, but I assumed that Park was his last name and there was some story-/character-related reason for it being used rather than his first name (although having read what you said about surnames being important in Korean culture now I'm not sure that'd be okay, either).

Anyway, thanks for writing this post. Even though I hadn't any plans to read E&P (and still don't), as a white reader I appreciate people like yourself taking the time to point out casual racism in books that purport to promote diversity; I know almost nothing about Korean culture (except that Park's a family name, which is, apparently, more than Rowell knows) and so, while I might get suspicious of an obviously offensive stereotype, there are a lot of other things that I wouldn't recognise as stereotypes as opposed to elements that were based off of actual research. And that's why it's so important to do the damn research, because it influences people's perception of the culture you're supposedly portraying.
My recent post The “Women’s vote” is sexist and has no place in the EU debate
2 replies · active 479 weeks ago
Yeah! This completely threw me off too! I went for the longest time thinking Eleanor just called Park Park because she wanted to sound cool or something lol. But actually it's part of our culture also to refer to people with their last names if we're first introduced to them, if they're above us in professional levels, etc. etc. I know this is perpetuated in Western cultures too, but it's REALLY important in Korean companies and cultures. Like I most likely won't call someone older than me or in a higher position by their name no matter how long I've known them. So for me to be called "Ahn" which is my last name, it wouldn't really be that big of an issue, it was more of how out of place it is to have someone's first name be a surname if that makes sense.

Yeah it's honestly been bothering me ever since I kept seeing it around everywhere and everyone praising it to the heavens. Especially because it sounded like it didn't actually want to bring the culture to light, but more put a show on with the culture (again, if that makes sense). It's got the essence but none of the actual culture. It sucks because this is normally why I'm always hesitant to read or watch.. or ANYTHING that has my culture in it that's not written by another Korean person because they won't get how it works or they won't get some of the humor we might have together. I just think it helps to go and ask people what their lives are like specific to their culture (or not because it'll still be a LOT more different) even if you don't understand it fully.
My recent post Let's Get to Know Victoria and Kit • Beautiful People
Oh, that's interesting to know about the use of last names in Korean culture. But, yes, that's completely different from using a surname as a given name.

I totally get what you mean about putting a show on with the culture instead of actually bringing the culture to light. My fiancé refers to books like Outlander as 'shortbread tin' representations of Scotland because they seem more like the twee pictures you get on a tin of shortbread than actual representations of Scottish culture. They don't feel like Scotland; they feel like a foreigner's idea of what Scotland might be like. These kind of representations tend not to be downright offensive in the way Eleanor & Park is, but I think there's a similar divide between actual representations of a culture and, as you put it, putting on a show with it (which is a very good way of describing it!), so I understand what you're getting at there.
My recent post Fantasy Worlds and Reader Assumptions
Are you really sending me chocolates??? :)
Now seriously.. I haven't read the book but I KNOW exactly what you mean. This sounds like when I hear people say "I am so TOLERANT I have all KIND of friends. I have three gay friends, two blacks, one latino" OMG if you are really not racist first you don't use the word TOLERANT. If you are not racist you don't need to "tolerate" people and you don't COUNT the number of minority friends you have like some kind of a badge. SMH!!!
So I can't stand books that claim to be diverse when they just "weirdify" the "diverse" characters by overly highlighting their "diversity" when a diverse book is the contrary. You include a character from a so call "minority" and make it look normal. Like what about a normal latino guy that wasn't a gardener or covered in gang ink or a absurdly great lover? or not making being "gay" the MOST important quality a character has.
GREAT POST Alexa!
My recent post What a Week [39]: Blogging Tip – What is your Blogger Age? Part I – Identity Crisis
1 reply · active 479 weeks ago
I will if you want hahaha!

Ugh yes I really hate this. I used to do it too, but then I kind of stopped because I was like "wait these are just people duh". I never used the word tolerate, but I definitely felt like I had more of a pass. But yes when people come up to me being like "I had an asian friend and...." and then go on to talk about stuff that doesn't have to relate to me at all it's like :T

It's so uncomfortable honestly? Like yes, I'm different than you I guess but so is that other white person that you're going to write about? We're all different and we shouldn't be shoved in a box of "diversity" because you want to pander to an audience and make yourself look like you're trying to be diverse.

Now I'm going to be honest, I live in SoCal so a lot of latinos I know ARE those that you listed but I also know a lot of them that aren't so there's a grain of truth, but then again, people make it to a caricature and it's like um... no these are real people. Please stop.
My recent post Let's Get to Know Victoria and Kit • Beautiful People
First thank youuuu Alexa for asking me to visit your blog! I'm so glad I found this, because I thought I was all alone with my scorn for E&P. I'm not Korean (I'm an Asian-Kiwi), but I completely completely share and relate to your disdain for E&P and all the questionable stuff that went on in that book.

Ever since reading the synopsis and several reviews (I think it was this one: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/527726383) and several other criticisms of it, I've decided to never pick up E&P. (Even for rant rights. Though I feel like I've heard enough about the book to know that I won't ever read it.) Idk, I think that the harmful stereotypes and insults about my Asianness (that I had to put up with when I was younger??) were intended to be something 'sweet' and 'endearing' in a book really rubs me off the wrong way. And how Eleanor really exoticizes him and fetishizes him really makes me uncomfortable too. Nothing is creepier and more icky than a weeaboo.

I really, really don't like how Rowell portrayed the mother too. It perpetuates the idea that Asian women are some dainty, exotic lotus flowers who have no personality and are just accessories to white men. And that really grosses me out. Because it is really, really exhausting for these writers to portray Asian women with no personalities and no characters, because I am not like that!! You are not like that!! Asian women are just as complex as white women!

Asian-Americans don't get enough representation as it is, so I'm worried that they will internalize what is portrayed in E&P. Sigh.

ANYWAY, thank you for writing this post Alexa. It was so validating to read this. (Sorry for my word vomit.)
My recent post A Darker Shade of Magic by V.E. Schwab
1 reply · active 479 weeks ago
That reviewer articulated what I was thinking a lot better than I did haha. But my biggest annoyance is just that there's this whole blanket of "oh its the 80's so this racism is ok" and it's like no??? IT'S NOT?? It was just disgusting to be honest. I don't know man, there's just a lot of stuff I don't like in this book and the story for me is just not a well written one either.

I thought I was also alone on this one, but I'm really happy that I'm not lol.
I one of the few people who hasn't read this book, so I don't have a lot of valid things to say in response to this except that it's a shame Rowell got things so wrong. Would have been a lot better if she'd included Korean characters but done a bit more research about them - maybe some Korean beta readers?
My recent post Walk the Edge by Katie McGarry – Review & Giveaway
I originally liked Eleanor and Park when I read it a few years ago, but even by the next day, I started to realise all these things that were wrong with it. I didn't pick up on the 'Park' thing, but I did think the way his mum was written was a bit weird. I don't know a lot about Korea, apart from what I've read/studied and what I've seen on k-dramas, but even then. I had a lot of problems with Eleanor too, but that's a whole other rant.
1 reply · active 462 weeks ago
Ahaha yeah, in general I really didn't like the novel aside from the racist stuff. It was just really annoying to read the Eleanor in my opinion. The Park thing still boggles my mind. I've told my mom about it and she's like, "Well... maybe the mother wanted him to keep his Korean last name?" but it's obvious that she was really confused lmao. Koreans don't get a lot of coverage in Western media in general, so I get really defensive when it hits anything. I want my culture to be portrayed correctly and respectfully. This whole situation just made me really, really mad.

If I was being honest here, Park's mom would NOT be happy about their relationship. Eldest sons (and only sons) are huge parts in family dynamics and if you thought white parent in laws were bad, oh boy. Korean mother in laws are ten times worse. Park's mom wouldn't really be happy with his choice of romantic partner right off the bat.

Post a new comment

Comments by